Description: Households with Improved Sources of Sanitation
Sub descriptionDistrict20182019
Improved SanitationCorozal86258065
Improved SanitationOrange Walk89389003
Improved SanitationBelize3172031836
Improved SanitationCayo2143717826
Improved SanitationStann Creek897711623
Improved SanitationToledo61936087
Description: Households with Improved Sources of Sanitation - Rural
Sub descriptionDistrict20182019
Improved SanitationCorozal55974945
Improved SanitationOrange Walk59345958
Improved SanitationBelize100949654
Improved SanitationCayo88496951
Improved SanitationStann Creek62758946
Improved SanitationToledo47174675
Description: Households with Improved Sources of Sanitation - Urban
Sub descriptionDistrict20182019
Improved SanitationCorozal30283119
Improved SanitationOrange Walk30043046
Improved SanitationBelize2162622183
Improved SanitationCayo1258810875
Improved SanitationStann Creek27022678
Improved SanitationToledo14761411
Description: Households with Improved Sources of Sanitation.
Sub descriptionDistrict20182019
Don't Know or Not StatedCorozal--
Don't Know or Not StatedOrange Walk-50
Don't Know or Not StatedBelize131111
Don't Know or Not StatedCayo--
Don't Know or Not StatedStann Creek2015
Don't Know or Not StatedToledo--
Description: Households with Improved Sources of Sanitation. - Rural
Sub descriptionDistrict20182019
Don't Know or Not StatedCorozal--
Don't Know or Not StatedOrange Walk-25
Don't Know or Not StatedBelize131-
Don't Know or Not StatedCayo--
Don't Know or Not StatedStann Creek--
Don't Know or Not StatedToledo--
Description: Households with Improved Sources of Sanitation. - Urban
Sub descriptionDistrict20182019
Don't Know or Not StatedCorozal--
Don't Know or Not StatedOrange Walk-25
Don't Know or Not StatedBelize-111
Don't Know or Not StatedCayo--
Don't Know or Not StatedStann Creek2015
Don't Know or Not StatedToledo--
Description: Households with Unimproved Sources of Sanitation
Sub descriptionDistrict20182019
Unimproved SanitationCorozal20022570
Unimproved SanitationOrange Walk22571969
Unimproved SanitationBelize568219
Unimproved SanitationCayo9493535
Unimproved SanitationStann Creek2549825
Unimproved SanitationToledo13371733
Description: Households with Unimproved Sources of Sanitation - Rural
Sub descriptionDistrict20182019
Unimproved SanitationCorozal19222337
Unimproved SanitationOrange Walk19361773
Unimproved SanitationBelize239-
Unimproved SanitationCayo6112322
Unimproved SanitationStann Creek2432723
Unimproved SanitationToledo13051624
Description: Households with Unimproved Sources of Sanitation - Urban
Sub descriptionDistrict20182019
Unimproved SanitationCorozal80233
Unimproved SanitationOrange Walk322196
  • 1 - 50

Graph

Select Indicator from the drop down list below.

Select Records to Create Your Chart

Selection uses the standard keyboard modifiers to select or unselect.

Holding the Shift key while clicking or moving with arrow keys will select a range of rows.

Holding the Ctrl key while clicking or while moving with the arrow keys and using the Space key will select or unselect a row. Ctrl+A will select all.


Chart

DATA IDENTIFICATION


Name
Improved sanitation (SDG 6.2.1)
Indicator purpose

The purpose of this indicator is to ensure public health beyond the household level; this indicator incorporates the safe management of fecal waste along the entire sanitation chain, from containment to final treatment and disposal, and serves as a multi-purpose indicator contributing to indicator 6.3.1 on wastewater treatment.

Abstract

The proportion of population using safely managed sanitation services, including a hand-washing facility with soap and water is currently being measured by the proportion of the population using a basic sanitation facility which is not shared with other households and where excreta is safely disposed in situ or treated off-site. ‘Improved’ sanitation facilities include: flush or pour flush toilets to sewer systems, septic tanks or pit latrines, ventilated improved pit latrines, pit latrines with a slab, and composting toilets.

Data source

BWS/SIB

DATA CHARACTERISTICS



Contact organization person

BWS/SIB

Date last updated
29-OCT-2019
Periodicity

Biennial

Unit of measure

Percentage (%)

Other characteristics

MDG target 7C called for ‘sustainable access’ to ‘basic sanitation’. The JMP developed the metric of use of ‘improved’ sanitation facilities, which are likely to hygienically separate human excreta from human contact and has used this indicator to track progress towards the MDG target since 2000. International consultations since 2011 have established consensus on the need to build on and address the shortcomings of this indicator; specifically, to address normative criteria of the human right to water including accessibility, acceptability, and safety. Furthermore, the safe management of fecal wastes should be considered, as discharges of untreated wastewater into the environment create public health hazards.

DATA CONCEPTS and CLASSIFICATIONS



Classification used

Improved sanitation facilities include the following: flush or pour flush toilets to sewer systems, septic tanks or pit latrines, ventilated improved pit latrines, pit latrines with a slab, and composting toilets.

Safely disposed in situ; when pit latrines and septic tanks are not emptied, the excreta may still remain isolated from human contact and can be considered safely managed. For example, with the new SDG indicator, households that use twin pit latrines or safely abandon full pit latrines and dig new facilities, a common practice in rural areas, would be counted as using safely managed sanitation services.

Treated offsite; not all excreta from toilet facilities conveyed in sewers (as wastewater) or emptied from pit latrines and septic tanks (as faecal sludge) reaches a treatment site. For instance, a portion may leak from the sewer itself or, due to broken pumping installations, be discharged directly to the environment. Similarly, a portion of the faecal sludge emptied from containers may be discharged into open drains, to open ground or water bodies, rather than being transported to a treatment plant. And finally, even once the excreta reaches a treatment plant a portion may remain untreated, due to dysfunctional treatment equipment or inadequate treatment capacity, and be discharged to the environment. For the purposes of SDG monitoring, adequacy of treatment will initially be assessed based on the reported level of treatment.

A handwashing facility with soap and water: a handwashing facility is a device to contain, transport or regulate the flow of water to facilitate handwashing. This indicator is a proxy of actual handwashing practice, which has been found to be more accurate than other proxies such as self-reports of handwashing practices. 

Disaggregation

Disaggregation by place of residence (urban/rural) and socioeconomic status (wealth, affordability) is possible for all countries. Disaggregation by other stratifies of inequality (subnational, gender, disadvantaged groups, etc.) will be made where data permit. Sanitation services will be disaggregated by service level (including no services, basic, and safely managed services) following the JMP sanitation ladder.

Key statistical concepts

The percentage of the population using safely managed sanitation services is calculated by combining data on the proportion of the population using different types of basic sanitation facilities with estimates of the proportion of fecal waste which is safely disposed in situ or treated off-site.

Formula
-
OTHER ASPECTS



Recommended uses

This indicator can be used to measure the population using safely managed sanitation services and serves to help contribute to improved sanitation services.

Limitations

This framework has served as the basis for indicators 6.2.1 and 6.3.1. Data on safe disposal and treatment are not available for all countries.

Other comments

A framework for measuring faecal waste flows and safety factors has been developed and piloted in 12 countries (World Bank Water and Sanitation Program, 2014), and is being adopted and scaled up within the sanitation sector.

All the metadata shown was gathered from United Nation Statistics Division. The metadata was extracted from https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/.